Analysis of the Vulnerability of Farm Households to Flood Risk in Punjab, Pakistan

Authors

  • Waqas Manzoor Institure of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture Faisaalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52223/jei3012104

Keywords:

Climate change, Flood disasters, Rural area, Socioeconomic vulnerability, Household vulnerability

Abstract

Climate change is the most important challenge for developing as well as developed countries. Pakistan is a developing country and has faced different types of natural disasters such as floods in the last 10 years. The rural areas of Pakistan are adversely affected by floods, which cause significant losses to crops, assets, and the household members face illness, health problems, loss of family income, and displacement. Approximately, 7016 villages with a cropped area of 473998 acres have been affected only in Punjab due to floods during the last four years. The impact of floods is not the same among the different regions, races, ages, classes, and gender. In this regard, a study was conducted to analyze the vulnerability of farm households in three flood-prone districts of Punjab province of Pakistan. These three flood-prone districts have different population size, and are located in high-risk flood region of Punjab was selected for empirical analysis. A well-structured questionnaire was used. Minimum 120 respondents were selected through a random sampling technique. A farm household survey was conducted and a vulnerability index was developed by using well-defined indicators. Three major dimensions of vulnerability were analyzed in detail such as exposure, adaptive capacity, and sensitivity. A multiple linear regression model was used to formulate the results. The analyzed results showed that flood was the main cause of the destruction of houses, livestock, and destruction of agriculture production. Results showed that farm household communities were the most vulnerable and floods hazard has a negative impact on the livelihood of human beings and the economy of Punjab as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adger, W.N., and P.M Kelly, 1999. Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 3, 253-266.

Alexander, D., 2012. Models of social vulnerability to disasters. RCCS Annual Review. A selection from the Portuguese journal Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 4, 22-40.

Arouri, M., Nguyen, C., Youssef, A.B., 2015. Natural disasters, household welfare, and resilience: evidence from rural Vietnam. World Development, 70, 59-77.

Atta-ur-Rahman, Khan, A.N., 2011. Analysis of flood causes and associated socio-economic damages in the Hindukush region. Natural Hazards, 59, 1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9830-8

Bari, S., 2011. Citizen characteristics for sustainable rehabilitation of flood affectees. Journal of Applied Natural Disasters, 3, 102-125.

Cimellaro, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M., Bruneau, M., 2010. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Engineering Structures, 32(11), 3639-3649.

Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., Shirley, W.L., 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 242-261.

Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Murray, S., Kirsch, T.D., 2013. The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS currents, 5.

Gbetibouo, G.A., Ringler, C., 2009. Mapping South African farming sector vulnerability to climate change and variability: a subnational assessment (pp. 2-4). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Center for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa (CEEPA).

Ginige, K., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., 2009. Mainstreaming gender in disaster reduction: why and how?. Disaster Prevention and Management, 18(1), 23-34.

GoP, 2015. Annual report of national disaster management, Prime Minister’s Office Premises Islamabad Pakistan.

GoP, 2016. Annual report of national disaster management, Prime Minister’s Office Premises Islamabad Pakistan.

GoP, 2017. Economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Gunawardena, A., Wickramasinghe, K., 2010. Targeting and distribution of post-tsunami aid in Sri Lanka. Working Paper No.55, Pp. 10.

IPCC, 2001. Third assessment report (TAR) of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, parts 1, 2 and 3, Synthesis Report and Policy Makers Summaries, Cambridge University Press, Pp. 110-115, Cambridge, UK.

IPCC, 2012. The Physical science basis. Working Group Contribution to the 4th Assessment Report Summary for Policymakers.

IPCC, 2013. The physical Science basis. Working Group Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report Summary for Policymakers.

Joerin, J., Shaw, R., Takeuchi, Y., Krishnamurthy, R., 2012. Assessing community resilience to climate-related disasters in Chennai, India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 1, 44-54.

Johnson, R.A., Wichern, D.W., 2002. Applied multivariate statistical analysis (Vol. 5, No. 8). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Nelson, R., Kokic, P., Crimp, S., Martin, P., Meinke, H., Howden, S.M., de Voil, P., Nidumolu, U., 2010. The vulnerability of Australian rural communities to climate variability and change: part II—Integrating impacts with adaptive capacity. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(1),18-27.

Pielke, J., Anthoni, R., 2000. Flood Impacts on Society: damaging floods as a framework for assessment. Chapter 21 in D. Parker (ed.), Floods. Rutledge Press: London, 133-155.

Proag, V., 2014. The concept of vulnerability and resilience. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 369-376.

Rahman, M.T., Aldosary, A.S., Nahiduzzaman, K.M., Reza, I., 2016. Vulnerability of flash flooding in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Natural Hazards, 84, 1807–1830.

Riwthong, S., Schreinemachers, P., Grovermann, C., Berger, T., 2017. Agricultural commercialization: Risk perceptions, risk management and the role of pesticides in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 264-272.

Scheuer, S., D. Haase, and V. Meyer. 2011. Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: From a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability. Natural Hazards 58(2), 731–751.

Smith, J., Anthony, 1996. Anthropological research on hazard and disaster. Annual review of anthropology. 25, 303-328.

Tariq, M.A.U.R., 2013. Risk-based flood zoning employing expected annual damages: the Chenab River case study. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 27(8), 1957-1966.

Wilkinson, E., Brenes, A., 2014. Risk-informed decision-making: an agenda for improving risk assessments under HFA2. Produced for the climate and development knowledge network (CDKN) learning network on the use of climate and disaster risk assessments project, London.

World Bank, 2006. Hazard of nature, risks to development: evaluation of World Bank assistance for natural disaster, Washington, D.C, World Bank report no 4, 109-105.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Manzoor, W. (2021) “Analysis of the Vulnerability of Farm Households to Flood Risk in Punjab, Pakistan”, Journal of Economic Impact, 3(1), pp. 27–38. doi: 10.52223/jei3012104.

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Bookmark and Share